Monday, June 23, 2008
Proper use of fonts, colors and graphics for the web
This article discussed many things relating to font & design for websites including:
Font Color - The article points out that while the web offers more options for color than print typically does, black is still the best choice.
Heading Font Color - While black may be the best choice for reading font, a color that works with the color scheme of the page and has a strong contrast with the background is often the best for headings.
Font Families - This site recommends selecting Sans Serif fonts, while keeping in mind that how your font is viewed depends on the browser and computer that is using it. I was glad to see the tip for how to assure the font is viewed in way you'd like by using the CSS commands given.
Font Size - While this site recommends using one of two possible methods (pixel-based or em-based) for selecting font size, I think that I will always follow the ideas discussed in the Williams book, with major reading fonts as 12- to 14-point and other fonts relating to that based on contrasting font sizes. I will say, though, that on many sites, including this one, I have to increase the font size ( key + = key) in order to make large amounts of text comfortable for me to read.
Article: Proper Font Selection Can Make a Difference
As for the rest of this article, I felt that it mostly reiterated many of the points in Williams' writings on font selection, but with a focus on basic reading documents, rather than fliers and advertisements, as Williams often focused on. To some extents, it was a less "risky" lists of do's and don'ts (i.e, "Don't: Use more than two or three font styles in one document. Doing so can make the document look unattractive.") as it pertained to business publications and educational items such as essays.
Thursday, June 19, 2008
My Design Studio's MyDesignPrimer.com
One element of this page that I found interesting was the things that came up after pressing the link to "Font" that was embedded in the text.
I was interested in learning about the difference between PostScript and TrueType.
I also found interesting the fact that each "font" has 256 separate characters involved, 4 sets of 64 keys. I accessed the printable version of the chart of the 256 characters to print out because knowing where to type certain symbols, such as Ø, ∏, √, ∑ without navigating through annoying menus is invaluable for a math teacher. I'm excited!
As I went through the descriptions of the categories o typefaces, I was surprised to find that I believe some of the pictures were incorrect. For example, I think that the two fonts pictures for Modern (http://www.mydesignprimer.com/fonts/modern_typefaces_fonts_bodoni.shtml ) were not, in fact, Modern. I am sure of this, especially for the 2nd one pictures, as it has no serifs! I also feel as though the first one pictured as a Slab Serif (http://www.mydesignprimer.com/fonts/slab_serif_fonts_typefaces.shtml ), is not a Slab Serif, as it appears to have some thick-thin transitions.
I had never thought through the "repercussions" of using font styling before reading that portion of the page, but it makes sense to me. In the future I will use the special types of fonts (i.e., Arial Black) when they are available, but will stick to using Bold and Italic links, when they're not. I can understand the concern though.
I also found it interesting to learn the relationship between Points, Pica's and Inches. While I thought out loud about the conversions, my wife kept questioning, "Pikachu?" and I of course explained the difference between the two. We came to the conclusion that Pikachu is far more interesting that Picas, but picas may very well be more important.
I finally also know why some fonts are bigger than other fonts when at the same size. They are not actually larger, they just appear larger because of the way they "fit" into the point size. For the examples shown on the page, the 28 pt. script font has such a low "x-line" that it appears to be much smaller than the 28 pt. Stone Serif which has a very high "x-line" and is also ver wide. Regardless, the maximum height of the two sets of letters are the same!
One Space?!? One space between sentences? I am trying to switch right now while writing this, and it is hard! What if I can't transition and I do both in the same paragraph? One, two, two, one, one, two, oops, one, two, oops, one. I keep doing it subconsciously! I might have to give up and stick with two spaces. Maybe I'll ask my Mom for input, she always knows what to do here. If not her, my priest, maybe. I will surely explain to them that the rationale does make sense.
–-–-–- ---- --- _– At first, while making these symbols, I didn't realize that some were different from others. I was frustrated that my computer wasn't making "en dashes" different from hyphens, but once I zoomed way in, I could see the difference. I never knew that it was supposed to be different. Is that what happens when you use two of them -- and then hit space and they become one bigger one? It didn't appear to happen there, but it sure does in Microsoft Word.—See, now I've switched to an Em Dash!
*Notice, by the way, I have fallen right back into double-spacing between sentences. It's hopeless!
Finally, I always found quotation marks terribly frustrating in high school. periods in or out? commas in, or out? do I put a period here? here and here? here, or here? This always frustrated me. I'm glad that computer programs like Word are smart enough to pick the correct quotation mark (direction it faces) and to tell me when I've puncuated improperly. How nice!
I found this site interesting, though very in depth. I never knew there was so much to typography, and was surprised by some of the things that I learned!
Universal Principles of Design - Usability
Wednesday, June 18, 2008
The Non-Designers Design Book, Chapters 9, 10, 11, 14
- Concordant - Which is the safe route; it can be dull or it can be okay, depending on its use. I find that this is what I often use (i.e., one type face with different fonts (bold, italic, etc.)
- Conflicting - The wimpy method! This must be what keeps people scared of moving away from concordant--the take so little risk in their attempts at contrast, that their creation conflicts with itself, and scares them right back to concordant!
- Contrasting - This can very well be the ideal, when it is appropriate (it may not be appropriate in some formal places, like the pages of a novel) as long as it is done well, as in the quote that is "full of sound and fury" (I really liked this) or Popeye and Olive Oyl's wedding invitation.
- Oldstyle - Which is a serif category of fonts that replicates lines that would be made by a pen in writing the letters. This font is good for reading mass amounts.
- Modern - This serif category of fonts is a very vertical font, which has a strong thick/thin transition in contrast to Oldstyle's diagonal stress. These characteristics made Modern fonts not quite as good for reading long passages as Oldstyle is. As I read about Modern, I wondered if this was a result of the manner in which the type faces were made for the printing machines. It seems that these would be easier to make typefaces for than Oldstyle.
- Slab Serif - This serif category of fonts is one in which all parts of the letters are thick, including the serifs. There is no thick/thin transition or diagonal stress shown here. This category includes my most-used typeface, American Typewriter. I was relieved to find out that they ". . . are very high on the readability scale, meaning they can easily be used in extensive text." which made me feel good about my frequent use of American Typewriter in worksheets and the like.
- Sans Serif - This category of fonts has no serifs and typically have no thick/thin transition. The best known of these fonts is Arial, which implies to me that sans serif fonts must be good for reading (if Arial is so often used).
- Script - This broad category of fonts is, as Williams says, "like cheescake" in that it should not be "consumed" in large amounts. She also insists that you do not use these in caps. *Here is one of my mistakes on our wedding invite, it was all script! Not only that, but when I tried to contrast our names, I was smart enough to change weight and color, but stuck with another font of the same structure, script!
- Decorative - The fun stuff! Chiller! Fajita! Although she phrased it surprisingly, I was not surprised by the concept of Williams' quote on Decorative fonts, "If the thought of reading an entire book in that font makes you want to throw up, you can probably put it in the Decorative pot." I agree whole-heartedly with this sentiment in that these fonts, which can be serif (i.e., Blue Island) or sans serif (i.e., The Wall), are not good for reading in large amounts. I discovered my new favorite font, FlySwim, here!
- Size
- Weight
- Structure - Williams recommends utilizing 2 families with different structures (i.e., Slab Serif vs. Sans Serif) in order to assure contrast, not conflict.
- Form - Williams discusses contrasting between caps & lower case, while keeping in mind that TEXT WRITTEN IN CAPITAL LETTERS IS OFTEN HARDER TO READ. This is something that I have to look out for, as when I write by hand, I use what a computer would call "small caps" and what I call, "engineer's handwriting." She also discusses the difference between Roman text (a new term to me, it stands up straight) and Italic text (along with the difference between "true" and "fake" italic fonts.
- Direction - Williams discusses the difference between positive (up to the right) and negative (down to the right) direction, and its use. She also discusses how vertical and horizontal directions can be created in a sense of perception.
- Color - Here, Williams discusses the difference between warm and cool colors in writing. The effects that they have on the way that we process information is impressive. She also discusses how black & white color contrast can be utilized. I also learned about the "leading" of a block of text, which gives the text a lighter color.
- Confirm for me that Mr. Miller's font of choice, American Typewriter, is a Slab Serif, and therefore okay for "reading."
- Make me want to get more typefaces/fonts off of the internet!
Tuesday, June 17, 2008
Timeline
The “ability to construct meaning from visual images” (Giorgis, Johnson, Bonomo, Colbert, & al, 1999: 146) is known as visual literacy. Essentially, this skill refers to the ability to process information presented in a visual format or simply to “read a picture.” As an educator, I see visual literacy playing its most obvious and important role in the classroom. In order to help students learn, a teacher must present information through a variety of methods. The most common of these methods is visually. The first tool that was available for educators to help their students process information visually was a hornbook, which “ . . . was a flat board on which a sheet of paper printed with the alphabet, the Lord’s prayer, and several simple words were pasted” (McGrath, K., 777). These “ . . . appeared in Europe at the end of the 15th century” (Anzovin, S. & J. Podell, 80). The hornbook was followed by textbooks, the first of which was “. . . published in 1658 . . . for teaching Latin . . . ” (Anzovin, S. & J. Podell, 81). The globe revolutionized the teaching of geography, in years following “. . . 1810, [when] a Vermont farmer and copper engraver named James Wilson made the first American globes” (McGrath, K., 777). A major improvement in visual instruction came with the invention of the blackboard or chalkboard, which “. . . was patented in 1823 by Samuel Read Hall of Concord, Vermont . . .” (McGrath, K., 777). The 20th Century saw numerous changes in the way in which teachers are able to present information as a visual to their students. Among these was the use of films, which “. . . came into widespread classroom use in the 1940s and 1950s” (McGrath, K., 777). The first commercial application of a copy machine “ . . . was the Model 914, introduced in 1950 by the Haloid Company of Rochester, NY” which changed its name to the Xerox Corporation years later (Anzovin, S. & J. Podell, 371). Visual displays of materials further developed through the use of the overhead transparency projector, which premiered in the mid-1960s (Litas, C.); the LCD video projector, which was invented in 1984 (Gene Geldoff), but did not see widespread use until around the turn of the century; and the use of dry-erase or white boards, which “. . . did not begin to appear in business organizations until the mid-1980s” (About Blackboards); and the opaque overhead projector, which Hoo-Shik Kim received a patent for in 1996 (US Patent 4597207 – Overhead Projector). While there have been far more inventions in the field of education that have improved student learning, these are amongst the most important applications of John Debes’ idea of visual literacy in the American school systems.
Friday, June 13, 2008
Universal Principles of Design - Perception
The Non-Designer's Design Book, Chapters 1-6
Introduction
Hi! My name is Jake Miller. I am an 8th Grade math teacher at Kimpton Middle School in the Stow-Munroe Falls Schools and a Master's student in the ITEC Program.
Along with numerous around the house projects, vacations and teaching summer school, I will be taking Designing Visuals for Instruction & Research in Educational Services this summer.